Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 21:07

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
CNN interrupted for devastating Elon Musk news amid Donald Trump showdown - Irish Star
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
NASA says 'city killer' asteroid could smash into moon and is 'not safe' - Irish Star
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
OpenAI signs surprise deal with Google Cloud despite fierce AI rivalry - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are the most interesting use cases of Alibaba's Qwen model?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do you usually wear your panties over or under your pantyhose?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Astronauts Reveal The Shocking Beauty of Lightning From Space - ScienceAlert
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Stellar Blade More Than Doubles Sony’s Previous Steam CCU Record for Single Player Games - Wccftech